Head to head
vendor-status-mcp vs mcp-server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live status-page map for 1,127 SaaS/cloud vendors plus 15,418 historical incidents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Enable your AI agents to scrape and parse web content dynamically, including geo-restricted sites
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-server (94/100 against 60). mcp-server has noticeably more public adoption.
| vendor-status-mcp | mcp-server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 37 |
| Downloads / week | – | 324 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | ISC |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |