Head to head
schemagate vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Identity-scoped schema selection for text-to-SQL. Returns only the tables the caller may read.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 83). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; schemagate runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| schemagate | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |