Head to head
schemagate vs KEPTA — Agent Memory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Identity-scoped schema selection for text-to-SQL. Returns only the tables the caller may read.
Full listingKEPTA — Agent Memory
Bio.github.DamianTodorovic/keptaNo reviews yet
Local memory for AI agents. One SQLite file on your machine — no cloud, no account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours schemagate (83/100 against 74). KEPTA — Agent Memory has noticeably more public adoption.
| schemagate | KEPTA — Agent Memory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 729 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |