Head to head
Tradingview vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time market data, screeners, technical analysis & backtesting for stocks, crypto and forex.
Full listingNo reviews yet
No-logs VPN, real UK +44 number eSIMs and travel-data eSIMs, bought with crypto. No KYC, no account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tradingview (87/100 against 60). Tradingview has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tradingview | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 4.6k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |