Head to head
Tradingview vs IronWallet
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time market data, screeners, technical analysis & backtesting for stocks, crypto and forex.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Non-custodial crypto wallet MCP: check balances, sign and send transfers, and swap tokens locally.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 94 out of 100). Tradingview is hosted and callable through the gateway; IronWallet runs on your own machine. Tradingview has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tradingview | IronWallet | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.6k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 89 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 18 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |