Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ghostfox vs Stealthy Auto Browse

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Ghostfoxio.github.autokeren/ghostfox
C
No reviews yet

Self-hosted stealth browser for AI agents: Firefox engine + Rust MCP runtime

Full listing
Stealthy Auto Browseio.github.psyb0t/stealthy-auto-browse
A
No reviews yet

Self-hosted MCP server for stealth browser automation with human-like OS-level input.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Stealthy Auto Browse (88/100 against 65). Stealthy Auto Browse has noticeably more public adoption.

 GhostfoxStealthy Auto Browse
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC65/100A88/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars081
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITWTFPL
Last release2026-09-172026-09-13
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Ghostfox vs Behavior Runtime MCPGhostfox vs Aginx BrowserGhostfox vs Cssprobe CLIGhostfox vs GatewayGhostfox vs acrawlAll Scraping and browsing servers