Head to head
b/cited vs secobserve-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (76 and 83 out of 100). b/cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; secobserve-mcp runs on your own machine. secobserve-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| b/cited | secobserve-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 381 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |