Head to head
b/cited vs Reversecore MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (76 and 77 out of 100). b/cited is hosted and callable through the gateway; Reversecore MCP runs on your own machine. Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| b/cited | Reversecore MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 203 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |