Head to head
b/cited vs Accessproof
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Scan a web page's markup for the WCAG failures ADA demand letters cite most often.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (76 and 69 out of 100).
| b/cited | Accessproof | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 1 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | Security | Security |