Head to head
LiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Blockrun
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free bank research: NPA reconciliation, small finance banks, UCBs and cited evidence limits.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web search, deep research, prediction markets & crypto data for AI agents. Pay per call via x402.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Blockrun (82/100 against 67). LiquiLens — the Failure Radar is hosted and callable through the gateway; Blockrun runs on your own machine. Blockrun has noticeably more public adoption.
| LiquiLens — the Failure Radar | Blockrun | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 394 |
| Downloads / week | – | 474 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 22 | 19 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |
Other comparisons
LiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs StatCite — Verified Economic StatisticsLiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Signal Ledger Financial IntelligenceLiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs BankMCP™LiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Hive Intelligence MCPLiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsAll Finance servers