Head to head
LiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Hive Intelligence MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free bank research: NPA reconciliation, small finance banks, UCBs and cited evidence limits.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Evidence-backed crypto due diligence with sources, freshness, and a runtime receipt on every call.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (67 and 71 out of 100). Hive Intelligence MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| LiquiLens — the Failure Radar | Hive Intelligence MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B71/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 19 |
| Downloads / week | – | 898 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 22 | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |
Other comparisons
LiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs StatCite — Verified Economic StatisticsLiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Signal Ledger Financial IntelligenceLiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs BankMCP™LiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs BlockrunLiquiLens — the Failure Radar vs Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsAll Finance servers