Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent-Native Plan vs Gctrl

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent-Native Planio.github.BuilderIO/agent-native-plan
A
No reviews yet

Structured visual plans and PR recaps with diagrams, prototypes, annotations, and sharing

Full listing
Gctrlio.github.GCTRL-TECH/gctrl
B
No reviews yet

Governed graph-native agent memory: knowledge extraction, fusion, hybrid RAG, scoped access tokens.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Plan (98/100 against 82). Agent-Native Plan is hosted and callable through the gateway; Gctrl runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Plan has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent-Native PlanGctrl
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA98/100B82/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars4.9k7
Downloads / week–61
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—AGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-20
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agent-Native Plan vs Ts CoreAgent-Native Plan vs PatchloomAgent-Native Plan vs MCP ServerAgent-Native Plan vs FitterAgent-Native Plan vs UI VerifyAll AI and agents servers