Head to head
Churnkey vs Dunning
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Full listingNo reviews yet
Write payment chasers at three levels from the invoices that are actually overdue.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Churnkey (100/100 against 73). Churnkey is hosted and callable through the gateway; Dunning runs on your own machine. Churnkey has noticeably more public adoption.
| Churnkey | Dunning | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |