Mmcp.market

Head to head

WHOOP MCP vs Memory Vault

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

WHOOP MCPio.github.cunicopia-dev/whoop-postgres-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Sync WHOOP recovery, sleep, strain, and workouts into Postgres and query them from any MCP client.

Full listing
Memory Vaultio.github.MihaiBuilds/memory-vault
B
No reviews yet

Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours WHOOP MCP (83/100 against 70). Memory Vault has noticeably more public adoption.

 WHOOP MCPMemory Vault
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B70/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars063
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-132026-09-14
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

WHOOP MCP vs NeonWHOOP MCP vs PostgreSQLWHOOP MCP vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerWHOOP MCP vs Veeam VSPC MCPWHOOP MCP vs Postgres AIopsAll Databases servers