Head to head
WHOOP MCP vs Neon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Sync WHOOP recovery, sleep, strain, and workouts into Postgres and query them from any MCP client.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 83). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; WHOOP MCP runs on your own machine. Neon has noticeably more public adoption.
| WHOOP MCP | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 648 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |