Head to head
Pentest vs SecHelix
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Evidence-first security review of authorized repositories. Read-only, root-confined, no shell.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SecHelix (92/100 against 73). Pentest is hosted and callable through the gateway; SecHelix runs on your own machine.
| Pentest | SecHelix | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 116 | 58 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |