Head to head
Pentest vs Raven Nest
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI-driven penetration testing - 22 security tools behind safety-hardened MCP endpoints
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Raven Nest (88/100 against 73). Pentest is hosted and callable through the gateway; Raven Nest runs on your own machine.
| Pentest | Raven Nest | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 116 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |