Head to head
Uniprot vs FoxNose Knowledge
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Protein research over UniProtKB — search by function, fetch curated records, map IDs, proteomes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hybrid search, schema introspection and record read/write over FoxNose collections
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Uniprot (93/100 against 60). Uniprot has noticeably more public adoption.
| Uniprot | FoxNose Knowledge | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 102 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |