Head to head
browser-automation vs CRW Web Scraper
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
browser-automation
Bio.github.DataLeadsPRO/browser-automationNo reviews yet
Programmatic headless browser sessions: create, interact, browse, and extract - rendered in a real
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CRW Web Scraper (88/100 against 80). browser-automation is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRW Web Scraper runs on your own machine. CRW Web Scraper has noticeably more public adoption.
| browser-automation | CRW Web Scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1.1k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |