Head to head
MCP ZAP Server vs OpenQR
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Safe, self-hosted OWASP ZAP operator for guided AI security scans and reports.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenQR (86/100 against 73). OpenQR is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP ZAP Server runs on your own machine.
| MCP ZAP Server | OpenQR | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 66 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | 45 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 20 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Security | Security |