Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP ZAP Server vs Firefly Iii

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCP ZAP Serverio.github.dtkmn/mcp-zap-server
B
No reviews yet

Safe, self-hosted OWASP ZAP operator for guided AI security scans and reports.

Full listing
Firefly Iiiio.github.YakupEmreYerli/mcp-firefly-iii
B
No reviews yet

Security-first, self-hosted MCP server for Firefly III — 152 operations behind 5 scoped tools.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Firefly Iii (83/100 against 73).

 MCP ZAP ServerFirefly Iii
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB73/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars662
Downloads / week–74
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—2
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-12
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

MCP ZAP Server vs n8n MCP CommunityMCP ZAP Server vs OpenQRMCP ZAP Server vs pkgxrayMCP ZAP Server vs MCPMCP ZAP Server vs MCP Safety WardenAll Security servers