Head to head
TrustScan vs Security Preflight
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
TrustScan
Cio.github.entradox/trust-scanNo reviews yet
Security scanner for MCP servers and skills: Unicode injection, patterns, secrets.
Full listingSecurity Preflight
Bio.github.jdhart81/security-preflightNo reviews yet
Static MCP, source-code and injection-indicator checks with redacted signed receipts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Security Preflight (81/100 against 67).
| TrustScan | Security Preflight | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |