Head to head
TrustScan vs Moltline Code Review
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
TrustScan
Cio.github.entradox/trust-scanNo reviews yet
Security scanner for MCP servers and skills: Unicode injection, patterns, secrets.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Risk-scan a diff, flag AI-generated-code tells, find secrets. 5 of 7 tools need no account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Moltline Code Review (77/100 against 67). Moltline Code Review has noticeably more public adoption.
| TrustScan | Moltline Code Review | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | 7 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |