Head to head
Figranium MCP vs Openbrowser AI
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for creating, running, inspecting, and scheduling Figranium browser automations.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI browser automation. Write async Python to navigate, click, type, and extract data.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Figranium MCP (91/100 against 80). Openbrowser AI has noticeably more public adoption.
| Figranium MCP | Openbrowser AI | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 244 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | 266 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 15 | — |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |