Head to head
Firecrawl MCP Server vs Scrapeless
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Firecrawl — web search, scraping, and biomedical/arXiv paper search.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web search, browser automation, scraping, crawling and CAPTCHA solving for AI agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 92 out of 100). Scrapeless is hosted and callable through the gateway; Firecrawl MCP Server runs on your own machine. Firecrawl MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Firecrawl MCP Server | Scrapeless | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Established |
| GitHub stars | 7.5k | 169 |
| Downloads / week | 23k | 244 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-08 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |