Head to head
Firecrawl MCP Server vs Web Scraping
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Firecrawl — web search, scraping, and biomedical/arXiv paper search.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web scraping for AI agents: scrape, search, crawl, map any website to markdown + JSON. No browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Web Scraping (98/100 against 85). Web Scraping is hosted and callable through the gateway; Firecrawl MCP Server runs on your own machine. Firecrawl MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Firecrawl MCP Server | Web Scraping | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 7.5k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 23k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |