Mmcp.market

Head to head

FlurryPORT vs Protect

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

FlurryPORTio.flurryport/webhooks-and-rooms
A
No reviews yet

Webhook capture and replay, delivery pipes, and signed multi-agent rooms. No signup to start.

Full listing
Protectcom.scopeblind/protect-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours FlurryPORT (92/100 against 65).

 FlurryPORTProtect
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C65/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars09
Downloads / week1651.6k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools5512
Write actions125
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-082026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

FlurryPORT vs EthersFlow — Trust Gate for AI AgentsFlurryPORT vs MockserverFlurryPORT vs OrcareplayFlurryPORT vs Agent CommsFlurryPORT vs KLYPIX Project BrainAll AI and agents servers