Mmcp.market

Head to head

BagIQ MCP vs passwerk

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

BagIQ MCPio.github.frankbongo/bagiq
C
No reviews yet

Analyse disc golf bag gaps and overlap, recommend discs, and open an interactive Bag Map.

Full listing
passwerkio.github.ShahriarBijoy/passwerk
A
No reviews yet

Offline EU Battery Passport compiler: ingest documents, map, validate (IDTA 02035), emit AASX.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours passwerk (92/100 against 67). BagIQ MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; passwerk runs on your own machine. passwerk has noticeably more public adoption.

 BagIQ MCPpasswerk
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A92/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–0
Downloads / week–351
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools612
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—Apache-2.0
Last release—2026-09-15
CategoryMaps and travelMaps and travel

Other comparisons

BagIQ MCP vs Repo GraphBagIQ MCP vs TripsBagIQ MCP vs DekkoBagIQ MCP vs WayfinderBagIQ MCP vs MaprollAll Maps and travel servers