Head to head
BagIQ MCP vs Trips
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Analyse disc golf bag gaps and overlap, recommend discs, and open an interactive Bag Map.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Hand someone a complete trip as a private, editable map link. No account, no API key, no card.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trips (85/100 against 67). Trips has noticeably more public adoption.
| BagIQ MCP | Trips | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 277 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |