Mmcp.market

Head to head

HiddenContent vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HiddenContentai.hiddencontent/mcp
B
No reviews yet

Check a document for hidden text before your agent reads it. PDF, Office, RTF, HTML.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (79 and 85 out of 100). HiddenContent is hosted and callable through the gateway; PDF runs on your own machine. PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 HiddenContentPDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB79/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–136
Downloads / week711.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—13
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

HiddenContent vs Agent WormholeHiddenContent vs AgentMDHiddenContent vs MCPHiddenContent vs haiku.ragHiddenContent vs ProjectmemAll AI and agents servers