Head to head
HiddenContent vs Agent Wormhole
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Check a document for hidden text before your agent reads it. PDF, Office, RTF, HTML.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Check tokens, pages and x402 payments before your agent trusts them. Offline verdicts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (79 and 83 out of 100). HiddenContent is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Wormhole runs on your own machine. Agent Wormhole has noticeably more public adoption.
| HiddenContent | Agent Wormhole | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 71 | 776 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |