Head to head
health4ai vs PostgreSQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Query your Apple Health data from your own Supabase/Postgres via local MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 83 out of 100). PostgreSQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| health4ai | PostgreSQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |