Head to head
health4ai vs Memory Vault
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Query your Apple Health data from your own Supabase/Postgres via local MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours health4ai (83/100 against 70). Memory Vault has noticeably more public adoption.
| health4ai | Memory Vault | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 63 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |