Mmcp.market

Head to head

health4ai vs Atera MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

health4aiio.github.jefflitt1/health4ai
B
No reviews yet

Query your Apple Health data from your own Supabase/Postgres via local MCP.

Full listing
Atera MCPio.github.Servosity/atera-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Every Atera RMM + PSA endpoint, plus a local SQLite mirror that answers fleet-health, SLA, and

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours health4ai (83/100 against 75).

 health4aiAtera MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B75/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars041
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

health4ai vs PostgreSQLhealth4ai vs PostgreSQL MCP Serverhealth4ai vs Supabasehealth4ai vs Neonhealth4ai vs Memory VaultAll Databases servers