Mmcp.market

Head to head

Accessibility Statement Lint vs ctxlint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Accessibility Statement Lintio.github.jmshinhwa/accessibility-statement-lint
A
No reviews yet

Checks the accessibility statement you already published against the EU model statement and its two

Full listing
ctxlintio.github.YawLabs/ctxlint
A
No reviews yet

Lint AI agent context files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.) against your actual codebase

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 91 out of 100). ctxlint has noticeably more public adoption.

 Accessibility Statement Lintctxlint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100A91/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars09
Downloads / week–7.9k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Accessibility Statement Lint vs IWEAccessibility Statement Lint vs Munim Computer UseAccessibility Statement Lint vs SkillmdAll AI and agents servers