Head to head
Mcpcheck vs Passiv Web Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Mcpcheck
Cio.github.joeyough/mcpcheckNo reviews yet
Scan any MCP server for tool-poisoning, security, auth & license. Trust score before install.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Free web tools for AI agents: HTML to Markdown, compliance scan, page profile, security headers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (67 and 70 out of 100). Mcpcheck is hosted and callable through the gateway; Passiv Web Tools runs on your own machine.
| Mcpcheck | Passiv Web Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |