Head to head
Mcpcheck vs Webanalyzer
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Mcpcheck
Cio.github.joeyough/mcpcheckNo reviews yet
Scan any MCP server for tool-poisoning, security, auth & license. Trust score before install.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Free website analyzer: score any public URL 0-100 across 8 quality dimensions. No auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Webanalyzer (91/100 against 67). Webanalyzer has noticeably more public adoption.
| Mcpcheck | Webanalyzer | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |