Head to head
Lathe vs PostgreSQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Managed Postgres, Redis, CouchDB and NATS on a dedicated EU machine, one flat price.
Full listing
No reviews yet
PostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL MCP Server (83/100 against 70). Lathe is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL MCP Server runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Lathe | PostgreSQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |