Head to head
Commoncrawl vs PyreCrawl
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Use this MCP server to Common Crawl index discovery for historical web captures. Tools include...
Full listingNo reviews yet
Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 92 out of 100). PyreCrawl has noticeably more public adoption.
| Commoncrawl | PyreCrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 16 |
| Downloads / week | – | 153 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-08 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |