Head to head
Commoncrawl vs Web Scraping
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Use this MCP server to Common Crawl index discovery for historical web captures. Tools include...
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web scraping for AI agents: scrape, search, crawl, map any website to markdown + JSON. No browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Web Scraping (98/100 against 85). Web Scraping is hosted and callable through the gateway; Commoncrawl runs on your own machine. Web Scraping has noticeably more public adoption.
| Commoncrawl | Web Scraping | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-08 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |