Head to head
SecHelix vs Rune
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Evidence-first security review of authorized repositories. Read-only, root-confined, no shell.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Evidence-traced codebase understanding and security scanning for AI agents over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 89 out of 100).
| SecHelix | Rune | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 8 |
| Downloads / week | 58 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Security | Security |