Mmcp.market

Head to head

ReplyNodes vs PyreCrawl

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

ReplyNodescom.replynodes/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Web MCP: scrape/crawl sites, web search, brand assets, app stores, YouTube, Reddit, Hacker News.

Full listing
PyreCrawlio.github.SanggonBoy/PyreCrawl
A
No reviews yet

Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 92 out of 100). ReplyNodes is hosted and callable through the gateway; PyreCrawl runs on your own machine.

 ReplyNodesPyreCrawl
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA89/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars416
Downloads / week–153
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools5113
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-162026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

ReplyNodes vs CRW Web ScraperReplyNodes vs Web ScrapingReplyNodes vs Web ScraperReplyNodes vs CrawlbergReplyNodes vs SvipallAll Scraping and browsing servers