Head to head
ReplyNodes vs Crawlberg
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web MCP: scrape/crawl sites, web search, brand assets, app stores, YouTube, Reddit, Hacker News.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 85 out of 100). ReplyNodes is hosted and callable through the gateway; Crawlberg runs on your own machine.
| ReplyNodes | Crawlberg | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 177 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 51 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |