Head to head
DB Access vs StackQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Postgres/MySQL/Redshift/SQL Server over SSH/SSM tunnels with secret providers.
Full listing
No reviews yet
SQL-native query and provisioning engine for cloud infrastructure, served over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 90 out of 100). StackQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| DB Access | StackQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 991 |
| Downloads / week | 53 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |