Head to head
PyreCrawl vs SeleniumBase MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PyreCrawl (92/100 against 78). SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| PyreCrawl | SeleniumBase MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 16 | 13k |
| Downloads / week | 153 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 13 | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |