Head to head
SeleniumBase MCP vs ExtractEdge
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ExtractEdge
Dio.github.vasilicasijarvis/extractedgeNo reviews yet
Any web page -> clean markdown. Firecrawl-lite, 0.001 USDC/extract (x402, Base), free demo.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (86/100 against 43). ExtractEdge is hosted and callable through the gateway; SeleniumBase MCP runs on your own machine. SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| SeleniumBase MCP | ExtractEdge | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | D43/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | New |
| GitHub stars | 13k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 314k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 24 | 1 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |