Head to head
Trips vs Codna — repository intelligence
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hand someone a complete trip as a private, editable map link. No account, no API key, no card.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Map a repo before spending a token: triage, bug-fix PRs, SARIF reachability, on-device recall.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 82 out of 100). Trips is hosted and callable through the gateway; Codna — repository intelligence runs on your own machine. Trips has noticeably more public adoption.
| Trips | Codna — repository intelligence | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 277 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |