Head to head
Trooth vs npm Registry MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.
Full listing
No reviews yet
npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 83 out of 100). Trooth is hosted and callable through the gateway; npm Registry MCP Server runs on your own machine. npm Registry MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Trooth | npm Registry MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | 64 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Security | Security |