Mmcp.market

Head to head

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs Dvalincode

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewallio.github.alexar76/warden
A
No reviews yet

MCP security firewall: vet tool definitions before they reach the model.

Full listing
Dvalincodeio.github.arthurpanhku/dvalincode
A
No reviews yet

Deterministic security scanning, no model or API key, plus offline-verifiable proof a fix worked.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 85 out of 100). Dvalincode has noticeably more public adoption.

 WARDEN — MCP Security FirewallDvalincode
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars0117
Downloads / week5156
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools631
Write actions211
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-052026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs MCPWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs HOL GuardWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs ProjectmemWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs runxWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs LockstepAll AI and agents servers