Mmcp.market

Head to head

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs Lockstep

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewallio.github.alexar76/warden
A
No reviews yet

MCP security firewall: vet tool definitions before they reach the model.

Full listing
Lockstepio.github.lockstep-team-agent/lockstep
A
No reviews yet

Decision memory for AI coding agents: captures decisions once, briefs every agent before it acts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 91 out of 100). Lockstep has noticeably more public adoption.

 WARDEN — MCP Security FirewallLockstep
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A91/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars010
Downloads / week51175
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools619
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-052026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs MCPWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs HOL GuardWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs DvalincodeWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs ProjectmemWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs runxAll AI and agents servers